S
Agenda of the Commission
Period |
Activity |
January |
Collection of indicators and internal evaluation reports prepared by the units |
February |
Forwarding the information and data collected for the preparation of the internal evaluation report to KASGEM for evaluation |
February |
Submission of the internal evaluation report prepared by KASGEM to the Quality Commission |
March |
Revising the internal evaluation report within the framework of the evaluations of the Quality Commission and then submitting the institutional self-evaluation report to the Senate |
April |
Announcement of the accepted institutional self-evaluation report to internal and external stakeholders via the university web page |
April |
Identifying the areas to be improved in the aspects open to improvement in the institutional self-evaluation report and initiating the necessary work |
October |
Reviewing the improvements made and eliminating the deficiencies |
December |
Initiation of the preparation of indicators and the self-evaluation reports of the units by the Quality Commission Providing feedback to unit quality representatives and quality commissions with an information meeting regarding the self-evaluation reports of the units prepared in the previous year Informing the unit quality commissions about the preparation of the self-evaluation reports of the units, which will be completed in January |